The Economic Times daily newspaper is available online now.

    Wikimedia must remove India content deemed defamatory, court rules

    Synopsis

    An Indian court has ordered the removal of allegedly defamatory statements from Wikipedia regarding a domestic news agency, ANI. The Wikimedia Foundation, which operates Wikipedia, is considering appealing the ruling. ANI seeks damages and an apology, raising concerns about free speech implications in India.

    FILE PHOTO: Wikipedia webpage in use on a laptop computer is seen in this photo illustration taken in WashingtonReuters
    The operator of Wikipedia has been ordered to remove statements deemed defamatory by an Indian court from the page of a domestic news agency it hosts, the latest such directive to the popular online encyclopedia.

    The Wikimedia Foundation is the second major tech platform, following X, formerly Twitter, to become embroiled in recent years in court battles over content takedown orders in India.

    Last year the agency, ANI, sued Wikimedia for defamation in the Delhi High Court, citing a Wikipedia description that it faced criticism for being a government "propaganda tool" and sought removal of such statements.

    In an order on Thursday, the court said, "The impugned statements are... defamatory and tarnish the professional reputation of" ANI, and should be removed.

    The foundation did not respond to a request for comment on the ruling and whether it will appeal.

    Reuters, which owns a 26% stake in ANI, did not respond to a request for comment. It has previously said it is not involved in ANI's business practices or operations.

    The court will continue to hear the case, in which ANI seeks damages of about 20 million rupees ($240,000) and an apology from Wikimedia.

    The ruling "affirms the fundamental right to reputation", a lawyer for ANI, Sidhant Kumar, told Reuters in a statement.

    As a result of the dispute, U.S.-based Wikimedia has raised questions about free speech in the world's largest democracy.

    In October, the court ordered the takedown of a Wikipedia page related to the dispute, calling it "interference in court proceedings", prompting Wikimedia to go to the Supreme Court in January.

    Wikimedia said in its Supreme Court filing that "the selective and permanent takedown... creates a chilling effect on free speech, and restricts access to knowledge".

    X is also challenging government orders to block some posts about Indian farmers' protests in 2021.


    (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)

    (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2025  Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)

    Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online.

    ...more

    (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)

    (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2025  Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)

    Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online.

    ...more
    The Economic Times
    '; }); } if(listing) { var h3 = "You tried reading " + listArr.length + " locked stories in the past " + threshold + " days.", h4 = "Become an ET Prime member and don't miss out on these exclusive stories."; var html = '

    ' + h3 + '

    ' + h4 + '

      ' + listing + '
    '; $('#paidSCWidget').html(html); var callback = $('#paidSCWidget').attr('data-callback'); if(callback && window[callback]) { window[callback](); } customDimension.dimension72 += ' | Shown SYFT no Trial_With Missed Paywalled Articles Collection'; } else { _processNormal() } } }); } else { _processNormal(); } } catch (e) { _processNormal(); } }, function () { _processNormal(); }); //console.log('storyCollectionLoad', $); }

    Why ?

      Stories you might be interested in